Commentary: U.S. should weigh up balance before trade tariff moves

    Source: Xinhua| 2018-03-14 10:27:41|Editor: Liangyu
    Video PlayerClose

    BEIJING, March 14 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. admnistration's trade protectionism took in new moves recently, by the signing of controversial orders imposing a 25 percent levy on imported steel and a 10 percent charge on aluminum.

    Since the beginning of 2018, the United States has slapped tariffs on solar panels and other products. It has also sought to reduce its trade deficit with China by 1 billion U.S. dollars this year.

    Trade includes goods and service trade. However, service trade is not fully reflected in the statistics. The U.S. trade deficit version is overestimated by about 20 percent due to the calculation difference.

    The trade imbalance is also attributed to U.S. high technology controls towards China. The U.S.-China trade deficit would be reduced by 35 percent if such controls were relaxed, Chinese commerce minister Zhong Shan cited a report by a U.S. research institute as saying. Therefore, to solve the problem, the United States should make real efforts to relax the high-tech controls.

    Another point should be kept in mind: although the trade surplus is in China, the United States still enjoys a larger benefit from it.

    More than half of China's trade surplus comes from foreign-invested companies and processing trade, leaving little profit margins for China, while the lion's share of the profits from designing, component supplying and marketing go to the United States.

    Taking all this into account, there is a general trade balance between the two countries.

    In contrast to U.S. trade protectionism, China is opening up with greater efforts by fully opening up its general manufacturing sector to foreign investors and loosening regulations in many areas, including green cars.

    A trade war between the two countries would be a disaster, significantly affecting the United States.

    According to a report by Washington D.C.-based Peterson Institute for International Economics, a trade war would make millions of Americans lose jobs.

    Besides, restricting the import of products would weigh on U.S. enterprises and people. It is clear who would be the biggest loser.

    A trade war is never the right solution in a globalized world, as it would harm both the initiator and target country. In the event of a trade war, countries including China would make justified and necessary responses. Hopefully the United States will be wise enough to figure out a proper solution.

    TOP STORIES
    EDITOR’S CHOICE
    MOST VIEWED
    EXPLORE XINHUANET
    010020070750000000000000011100001370380041
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人深夜福利视频| 久久久国产99久久国产一| 久热这里只有精品视频6| 久久人人爽人人爽人人av东京热| 三浦惠理子在线播放| 97久人人做人人妻人人玩精品| 欧美色图校园春色| 网站正能量www正能量视频| 熟妇人妻无码XXX视频| 极品丝袜老师h系列全文阅读| 无码国产精品一区二区免费vr| 大学生一级毛片免费看**| 国产成人综合久久精品| 午夜人妻久久久久久久久| 亚洲国产成人高清在线观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品不卡| 99久久国产综合精品成人影院| 韩国三级日本三级香港三级黄| 百合潮湿的欲望| 最漂亮夫上司犯连七天| 婷婷色在线观看| 国产成视频在线观看| 免费一级毛片不卡不收费| 久久综合狠狠综合久久综合88| uyghur69sexvideos| 高清欧美一区二区三区| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 日韩精品无码一本二本三本色| 姚瑶小说穿越到古代免费阅读下载| 国产欧美日韩精品a在线观看| 免费看美女让人桶尿口| 久久无码无码久久综合综合| CHINESE熟女老女人HD视频| 色综合五月婷婷| 欧美人成在线观看| 学霸c了我一节课| 国产在线观看色| 亚洲成在人线电影天堂色| 一本大道久久a久久精品综合| 成人黄色在线网站| 欧美理论电影在线|